alert-icon

The currency displayed has been switched according to the country of your account. The items in your cart will now appear in AUD.

alert-icon

You successfully switched to AUD currency. The items in your cart will now appear in AUD.

alert-icon

We are experiencing a higher than usual volume of enquiries across our support teams, and responses may be delayed. Thank you for your patience.

alert-icon

${loserAccounts} been merged into ${winnerAccount}.

A recent audit found these accounts to be duplicative. Addresses, order history and Q-global ordering for both accounts are now accessible via the ${winnerAccount} account. If something isn’t right, please contact us.

alert-icon

${loserAccounts} been merged into ${winnerAccount}.

A recent audit found these accounts to be duplicative. Addresses, qualified users, order history and Q-global ordering for both organisations are now accessible via the ${winnerAccount} account. If something isn’t right, contact us.

To assess memory functioning in adults
Cambridge Prospective Memory Test
Activate to view the image in zoom mode

Cambridge Prospective Memory Test

CAMPROMPT

To assess memory functioning in adults
Publication date:
2005
Completion time:
25 minutes
Administration:
Individual; Manual scoring
Age range:
16 to 89 years
Qualification level:
B

The most common memory complaints are concerned with failures of prospective memory, yet this aspect of memory function is rarely assessed formally.

What is prospective memory?
Prospective memory is the ability to remember to do things at a particular time or within a given interval of time or when a certain event happens. In other words, prospective memory is remembering to do things rather than remembering things that have already happened. For people with brain injury, failures in prospective memory, such as forgetting to take medication, can have devastating effects on everyday life and are likely to threaten independence.

Despite its clinical significance, prospective memory has been relatively under investigated, due perhaps to the absence of a suitably objective and standardised clinical instrument, which is able to accommodate activities in daily life as opposed to ‘laboratory’ or computerised tasks that may not reflect real life needs.

Following a pilot study (Groot et al, 2002), the authors modified this version and now offer a test that comprises of three time based tasks and three event based tasks. Norms have been collected from 212 controls and a group of people with brain injury. Considerable differences between age groups and groups of different ability levels are reported and reflected in the scoring. Significant correlations with retrospective memory functioning were found.